Unit 5 · 6 teaching hours · 16 min read

Sample Survey

What the syllabus asks for 6
  • Population and sample; census versus sample survey
  • Organising a sample survey
  • Sample selection and determining the sample size
  • Sampling and non-sampling errors
  • Pictures of a sample survey
  • Eight rules of a good sample survey

Measuring every unit of a population is usually too slow or too costly (or impossible: testing a battery to destruction). A sample survey studies a part and generalises to the whole.

This unit covers the concepts and the practical organisation of a survey; Unit 6 covers the sampling designs and estimation.

What this unit gives you
  • Population, sample, sampling frame; census versus sample survey; the need for sampling.
  • Organising a survey: planning, questionnaire design, pilot, field work.
  • Selecting a sample and determining the sample size (with a worked formula).
  • Sampling and non-sampling errors.

5.1 Population and sample; census versus sample survey

The target population is all units about which we want information; the sampling frame is the list from which the sample is drawn (a voters' list, a student register), which should cover the population without omissions or duplicates; a sampling unit is the element or group selected; a sample is the selected part; sample size n and population size N give the sampling fraction f = \frac{n}{N}.

A census (complete enumeration) studies every unit; a sample survey studies some.

Census Sample survey
Cost and time high much lower
Coverage all units part
Accuracy no sampling error; non-sampling errors may be large has sampling error, but careful work can reduce others
Suitable when small populations, or a complete list is needed large populations, destructive testing, speed matters

Needs of sampling: economy, speed, feasibility when testing destroys the unit (bulbs, crash tests), better quality of fieldwork with fewer, better-trained enumerators, and accuracy that is often high enough.

Limitations: sampling error; needs expertise in design; not usable when every unit's information is needed (a census of voters for elections).

5.2 Organising a sample survey

  1. Define objectives precisely: what, who, where, when. 2. Define the population and frame. 3. Decide the data to collect and the method (interview, mail, phone, web). 4. Design the questionnaire (below). 5. Choose the sampling design and size. 6. Pilot survey on a small group to test questions and procedure. 7. Train the field staff and supervise. 8. Collect data and follow up non-response. 9. Edit, code, enter and check the data. 10. Analyse and report with limitations stated.

Questionnaire design

Keep it short and relevant; use clear, simple, unambiguous words; a s k one thing per question (avoid "double-barrelled" questions); avoid leading questions ("Don't you agree that…") and sensitive questions early; provide exhaustive, mutually exclusive options; begin with easy questions and order logically; use closed questions (fixed options, easy to analyse) and some open ones (richer but hard to code); use Likert scales (strongly disagree … strongly agree) for opinions; add clear instructions and a thank-you; pilot-test.

5.3 Sample selection and determining the sample size

Probability (random) sampling gives every unit a known non-zero chance of selection, which allows valid error estimates: simple random, stratified, systematic, cluster, multistage (Unit 6).

Non-probability sampling (convenience, judgement, quota, snowball) is cheaper but cannot give valid sampling-error estimates and may be biased.

Sample size depends on the required precision (margin of error e), the confidence level (z), the variability of the data, and the population size.

To estimate a proportion within \pm e: n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} p (1 - p)}{e^{2}}, taking p = 0.5 (the worst case, which maximises p (1 - p) = 0.25) when unknown. For a mean: n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} \sigma^{2}}{e^{2}}.

For a finite population of size N apply the finite population correction: n = \frac{n_{0}}{1 + \frac{n_{0} - 1}{N}}.

Worked example

A college wants the percentage of students who use the library, within \pm 5 points at 95% confidence (z = 1.96) ,\ p unknown. n_{0} = 1.96^{2} \times 0.25 / 0.05^{2} = 0.9604 / 0.0025 = 384.16 \to 385.

The college has N = 2,000 students: n = \frac{384.16}{1 + 383.16 / 2000} = 322.4 \to 323.

Tightening the margin to \pm 3 points needs 1.96^{2} \times 0.25 / 0.03^{2} = 1,067.11 → 1,068 (before the correction): precision is expensive because n grows with \frac{1}{e^{2}}, so halving the error quadruples the sample.

Increasing the confidence to 99% (z = 2.576) enlarges n by (2.576 / 1.96)^{2} = 1.73 times.

5.4 Sampling and non-sampling errors

Sampling error is the difference between a sample estimate and the true population value that arises because only part of the population is observed.

It is random, can be measured (standard error), and decreases as n increases (roughly ∝ \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}); a census has none.

Non-sampling errors can occur even in a census and do not decrease with larger samples; they are often the larger problem:

Source Examples Remedy
Frame errors out-of-date or incomplete list update and check the frame
Non-response people not at home or refuse callbacks, incentives, weighting, substitute carefully
Response/measurement errors misunderstanding, memory, lying, interviewer effect clear questions, trained interviewers, validation
Processing errors coding, data-entry, tabulation mistakes double entry, range checks
Selection bias non-random choice use probability sampling

Bias is a systematic error pushing estimates one way (a web survey about internet use over-represents internet users), whereas random sampling error averages out. Total survey error = sampling error + non-sampling error.

5.5 Pictures of a sample survey

diagram
Figure 5.1. The life of a sample survey and where each error enters. The frame may miss units (frame error); only part of the population is drawn (sampling error, measurable); some chosen units do not answer or answer wrongly (non-response and response error); data entry adds processing error. Inference then goes back from sample to population.

diagram
Figure 5.2. Sample size against margin of error for a proportion at 95% confidence (p = 0.5): n = \frac{0.9604}{e^{2}}. Halving the margin quadruples the sample, so precision is expensive: \pm 5 points needs 385 ,\ \pm 3 needs 1,068 and \pm 1 needs 9,604 respondents.

diagram
Figure 5.3. Random error versus bias, shown as four targets (centre = true value). (a) Accurate and precise: small sampling error and no bias. (b) Precise but biased: a bad frame or a leading question moves every estimate the same way. (c) Unbiased but scattered: a small sample, large sampling error. (d) Both problems.

5.6 Eight rules of a good sample survey

  1. State the objective in one sentence. A vague aim such as "learn about students" gives useless data. A clear aim such as "the share of BCA students who use e-books weekly" fixes who, what and when. Every question afterwards must serve that sentence.
  2. Build a complete, up-to-date frame. The frame is the list from which units are drawn, so a missing name can never be selected. An old voters' list or an outdated student register causes frame error. Updating the list is cheaper than correcting a biased result.
  3. Choose probability sampling. Giving every unit a known chance of selection allows an honest margin of error. Convenience samples, such as asking friends, cannot do this. Simple random, stratified and cluster designs are covered in Unit 6.
  4. Work out the sample size, do not guess. Use n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} p (1 - p)}{e^{2}} and apply the finite-population correction for a small population. A college of 2,000 needs about 323 students for \pm 5 points at 95% confidence. Too small a sample wastes the survey; too large wastes money.
  5. Write simple, neutral questions. Ask one thing at a time and avoid leading words such as "Don't you agree". Offer options that cover all answers without overlap. Translate carefully into Nepali, since a changed word changes the answer.
  6. Pilot-test first. Try the form on 10 to 20 people and watch where they hesitate. Fix the confusing items and time the interview. A one-day pilot often saves weeks of bad fieldwork.
  7. Train enumerators and control non-response. Interviewers must read questions exactly and record answers honestly. Callbacks, a convenient time and a short form raise the response rate. Large non-response is a bigger danger than a small sample.
  8. Check, enter and report with care. Edit forms for gaps, use double entry or range checks, and keep a log of changes. Report the frame, the sample size, the response rate and the margin of error. Honest reporting lets readers judge how far to trust the numbers.

photograph
(a) A ballot urn (suffrage monument, Paris)
diagram
(b) 500 polls of 400: random sample vs phone list
Plate 5.1. A big sample can still be wrong. (a) A ballot u r n on a monument to universal suffrage in Paris. In 1936 the American magazine Literary Digest mailed ten million ballots, got 2.4 million back and predicted that Landon would beat Roosevelt with 57 percent of the vote; Roosevelt won with about 61 percent. The list came from car and telephone owners, a biased frame. (b) A simulation of the same mistake: in a population of 10,000 voters exactly 30 percent support a party, but supporters are more likely to own a phone (90 percent against 50 percent), so the phone list is 43.5 percent supporters. Over 500 polls of 400 people, random samples from everybody average 0.301 (spread 0.023), while samples from the phone list average 0.434 (spread 0.024). The spread is the same; the bias is not, and a bigger sample does not remove bias.Photo credits: (a) Jebulon, CC0.

photograph
(a) Dice: a simple random mechanism
diagram
(b) Standard error of a proportion, p = 0.30
Plate 5.2. Chance makes errors that shrink with the square root of the sample size. (a) Dice: the simplest random-number generator. (b) The sampling error (standard error) of a proportion p = 0.30 is sqrt(p \frac{1 - p}{n}). For n = 100, 400 and 1,600 the formula gives 0.0458, 0.0229 and 0.0115, and 2,000 simulated surveys of each size (seed 2081) gave 0.0462, 0.0226 and 0.0112. Each time the sample is multiplied by 4, the error is halved. This is why sampling error can be controlled by paying for a larger sample, whereas a non-sampling error such as a badly worded question or a missing group is not reduced at all by a larger sample.Photo credits: (a) Diacritica, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Formula and fact sheet

  • Sampling fraction f = \frac{n}{N}. Proportion: n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} p (1 - p)}{e^{2}} ( p = 0.5 worst case). Mean: n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} \sigma^{2}}{e^{2}}.
  • Finite population correction: n = \frac{n_{0}}{1 + \frac{n_{0} - 1}{N}}. Halving e quadruples n.
  • z = 1.645 (90%), 1.96 (95%), 2.576 (99%).
  • Sampling error falls with n; non-sampling error does not.

Chapter summary

  • A sample survey is faster and cheaper than a census; its quality depends on the frame, the design, the questionnaire, the sample size and the control of errors.
  • Sample size for a proportion follows n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} p (1 - p)}{e^{2}} with a finite-population correction.
  • Sampling error is random and shrinks with n; non-sampling errors are systematic and need careful procedures.

Practice

  1. Differentiate census and sample survey with advantages of each.
  2. Define sampling frame, sampling unit and sampling fraction.
  3. Find the sample size to estimate a proportion within \pm 4 \% at 95% confidence (p unknown); apply the correction for N = 5,000.
  4. List the guidelines for a good questionnaire; criticise "Do you agree that the poor service of the library should be improved?"
  5. Differentiate sampling and non-sampling errors; give two examples of the latter.
  6. Why is a larger sample not a cure for bias?
  7. Why is p = 0.5 used when the proportion is unknown?
Answers and worked solutions

1. Census: complete, no sampling error, costly. Sample survey: cheaper, faster, usable for destructive tests, but has sampling error.

2. Frame: list of units from which to sample; unit: element or group selected; fraction: \frac{n}{N}.

3. n_{0} = 1.96^{2} \times 0.25 / 0.04^{2} = 0.9604 / 0.0016 = 600.25 \to 601. With N = 5,000: \frac{600.25}{1 + 599.25 / 5000} = 536.0 \to 536.

4. Guidelines in 5.2. The example is leading and loaded ("poor service") and double-barrelled; neutral: "How satisfied are you with the library service?" with a scale.

5. Sampling error comes from observing only a part (measurable, shrinks with n). Non-sampling: non-response, measurement error, frame error, processing error.

6. Bias is systematic: a larger sample from a biased procedure only gives a more precise wrong answer.

7. p (1 - p) is largest (0.25) at p = 0.5, so the resulting n is large enough for any true p.

Model answers: medium (5 marks) and long (10 marks) questions

Q1 (5 marks). A municipality has 20,000 households. Find the sample size needed to estimate the proportion with home internet within \pm 2 percentage points at 99% confidence. How many households would be needed to estimate mean monthly data use if \sigma = 12 GB and the error allowed is \pm 2 GB at 95% confidence?

Introduction. The sample size for a proportion is n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} p (1 - p)}{e^{2}}. With no prior estimate we take p = 0.5, which gives the largest possible p (1 - p) = 0.25 and so a safe size.

Proportion. For 99% confidence z = 2.576, and e = 0.02. n_{0} = 2.576^{2} \times 0.25 / 0.02^{2} = 1.6589 / 0.0004 = 4147.4, rounded up to 4,148.

Finite-population correction. The population is small enough to matter, so n = \frac{n_{0}}{1 + \frac{n_{0} - 1}{N}} = \frac{4147.36}{1 + 4146.36 / 20000} = 4147.36 / 1.2073 = 3435.2, rounded up to 3,436 households.

Mean. For a mean, n_{0} = \frac{z^{2} \sigma^{2}}{e^{2}} = 1.96^{2} \times 12^{2} / 2^{2} = 3.8416 × 144/4 = 138.3, rounded up to 139 households.

Interpretation. Estimating a proportion to a tight \pm 2 points costs many more interviews than estimating a mean to a reasonable precision.

Conclusion Always round up, apply the correction when n is a noticeable part of N, and remember that halving e multiplies n by four.

Q2 (5 marks). Distinguish between a census and a sample survey. When is a sample survey preferred?

Introduction. A census collects information from every unit of the population; a sample survey collects it from a selected part and generalises to the whole.

Nepal's decennial population census is the standard example of the first; a college's satisfaction survey of 300 students is an example of the second.

Comparison (Table).

Point Census Sample survey
Coverage every unit a selected part
Cost and time very high, years of work much lower, results in weeks
Sampling error none present but measurable
Non-sampling error can be large (many enumerators) easier to control with fewer, trained staff
Detail small-area figures available only for large groups

When a sample survey is preferred. (1) The population is very large. (2) Testing destroys the unit, as with bulbs or crash tests. (3) Results are needed quickly. (4) The budget is limited. (5) Better-trained interviewers can improve quality.

When a census is needed. When every unit's record matters, such as the voter list or small-area planning data.

Conclusion A well-designed sample is often more accurate in practice than a rushed census.

Q3 (10 marks). Explain the steps of organising a sample survey and discuss sampling and non-sampling errors with their remedies.

Introduction. A sample survey studies a part of the population in order to infer about the whole. Its quality depends on planning, design and control of errors (Figure 5.1 shows the life of a survey).

Steps of organising a survey.

  1. Objectives: state precisely what, who, where and when.
  2. Population and frame: define the target population and prepare an up-to-date, complete list.
  3. Data and method: decide the items to collect and the method (interview, mail, phone, web).
  4. Questionnaire: short, clear, neutral, one idea per question, logically ordered.
  5. Sampling design and size: choose a probability design and compute n = \frac{z^{2} p (1 - p)}{e^{2}}.
  6. Pilot survey: test the form and field procedure on a small group.
  7. Fieldwork: train enumerators, supervise, follow up non-response.
  8. Editing, tabulation, analysis and report: check, code, enter, estimate and report with margins of error.

Sampling error. It is the difference between the sample estimate and the true value because only a part is observed. It is random, measurable through the standard error, and falls roughly as \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}; a census has none.

For example, with n = 385 the margin for a proportion is about \pm 5 points, and with n = 1,068 it is about \pm 3 (Figure 5.2).

Non-sampling errors. They arise at every stage, occur even in a census, and do not shrink with larger n.

Source Example Remedy
Frame error outdated list, missing hostels update and check the frame
Non-response nobody at home, refusals callbacks, short form, weighting
Response error memory lapse, sensitive question clear wording, trained interviewers
Processing error wrong code, typing mistake double entry, range checks
Selection bias asking friends only probability sampling

Sampling versus non-sampling (Table).

Point Sampling error Non-sampling error
Cause observing only a part mistakes in design, collection, processing
Direction random, averages out often one-sided (bias)
Effect of larger n decreases may increase
Measurable? yes, by standard error difficult
In a census absent present

Conclusion. Total survey error is sampling error plus non-sampling error.

Increasing n helps only against the first, so a good survey invests in a sound frame, clear questions, trained staff and a high response rate, as Figure 5.3 shows with its targets of bias and scatter.